Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Pacifica) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Sharan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 151 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Pacifica consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 750 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Sharan engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Sharan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Pacifica has 106 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |