Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

 
Chrysler Pacifica
2016 -
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Petrol2.0 Diesel
Petrol engines (Chrysler Pacifica) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Sharan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 291 HP170 HP
Torque: 355 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.8 seconds
Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 121 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.75.9
Real fuel consumption: 11.2 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Pacifica consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 720 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 71 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway1290 km on highway
630 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Sharan engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years6 years
Engine spread: Used also on Jeep WranglerInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 5.18 m4.85 m
Width: 2.02 m1.90 m
Height: 1.78 m1.74 m
Chrysler Pacifica is larger.
Chrysler Pacifica is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 915 litres809 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
3979 litresno data
Chrysler Pacifica has more luggage capacity.
Chrysler Pacifica has 106 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`7242`370
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 29 60014 000
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Pacifica has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv