Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Renault Trafic 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 146 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 720 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 131 mm (5.2 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Trafic can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Trafic version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 18 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 1000 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | 2100 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 85 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 1879 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |