Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 19 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 201 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Vivaro, Nissan Primastar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.94 m | |
| Chrysler Pacifica and Renault Trafic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 2150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Chrysler Pacifica has 1235 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Trafic, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |