Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Pacifica) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Trafic) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 176 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 39 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 1240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 325 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |