Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Chrysler Pacifica is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-7 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Chrysler Pacifica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-7 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Pacifica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 | 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 253 HP | 238 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 339 NM | 350 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 12.3 | 11.0 - 11.5 | |
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.05 m | 4.68 m | |
Width: | 2.01 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 37 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 774 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 1476 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 1.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`286 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |