Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Mercedes R class 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes R class can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Pacifica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 350 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 5 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 12.3 | 9.3 - 16.3 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes R class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.03 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes R class, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 314 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 3215 litres | |
| Chrysler Pacifica has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes R class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes R class (by 965 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes R class, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`873 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Mercedes R klase has
| |