Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Epica has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Epica can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 12.3 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 25 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 20 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 111 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Epica, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |