Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Pacifica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jeep Grand Cherokee is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 257 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 355 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 13.8 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 178 - 204 mm (7 - 8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 608 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 341 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |