Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 4.0 | 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 257 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 355 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 13.8 | 11.3 - 12.3 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica 2006 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Pacifica 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Pacifica 2006 and Chrysler Pacifica 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 369 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 2250 litres | |
| Chrysler Pacifica 2006 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Pacifica 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica 2006 is 2.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Pacifica 2003, which means Chrysler Pacifica 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |