Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 147 - 283 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 218 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.4 - 11.6 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Grand Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Pacifica is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 748 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | 4550 litres | |
| Chrysler Pacifica has 167 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 571 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.07 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.029999999999999 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`724 | ~ 2`733 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |