Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Chrysler Pacifica is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 264 - 291 HP | 187 - 266 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 252 - 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Sienna are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chrysler Pacifica. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 10.7 | 11.2 - 13.1 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Sienna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 - 131 mm (5.1 - 5.2 inches) | 168 - 170 mm (6.6 - 6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Sienna can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Sienna, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 993 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3979 litres | 3810 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Sienna, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`791 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |