Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Dodge Durango 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is available only with front wheel drive, while Dodge Durango can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 (petrol, hybrid) | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Chrysler Pacifica is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 264 - 291 HP | 294 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 353 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Dodge Durango are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chrysler Pacifica. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 10.7 | 11.2 - 15.7 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Durango. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 - 131 mm (5.1 - 5.2 inches) | 203 - 207 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dodge Durango can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 7 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3979 litres | 2410 litres | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Pacifica has 425 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Durango. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 1569 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dodge Durango, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`791 kg | ~ 3`057 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`113 kg | ~ 2`319 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 678 kg | ~ 738 kg | |
| Chrysler Pacifica load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Dodge Durango. Therefore, Dodge Durango is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |