Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler LHS engine produces 36 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler 300M. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chrysler 300M is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler LHS consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler LHS could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler LHS is 27 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler LHS has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |