Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Opel Omega 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chrysler LHS
1998 - 2001
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Chrysler LHS is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Opel Omega has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Chrysler LHS is available with front wheel drive, while Opel Omega can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 3.5 (petrol)2.0 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Opel Omega is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 218 - 257 HP100 - 310 HP
Torque: 300 - 348 NM203 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds7 - 15 seconds
In general, Chrysler LHS are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Opel Omega. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.9 - 11.36.6 - 14.0
On average, the Chrysler LHS petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Opel Omega.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.27 m4.90 m
Width: 1.89 m1.78 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Chrysler LHS is larger, but lower.
Chrysler LHS is 37 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler LHS is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data830 litres
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight: ~ 2`100 kg~ 2`139 kg
Net weight:~ 1`618 kg~ 1`604 kg
Load capacity:~ 482 kg~ 535 kg
Chrysler LHS load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Chrysler LHS has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower price
Opel Omega has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv