Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Chevrolet Equinox 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler LHS is available only with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Equinox can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 257 HP | 139 - 256 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 348 NM | 275 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 11.3 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Chrysler LHS petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Equinox. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler LHS is larger, but lower. Chrysler LHS is 62 cm longer than the Chevrolet Equinox, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler LHS is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 847 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1798 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler LHS has 317 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Equinox. This could mean that the Chrysler LHS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler LHS has
|
Chevrolet Equinox has
| |