Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Opel Astra 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 335 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 210 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 250 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Opel Astra 2001 1.8 engine: Mechanically reliable engine, but the engine control unit can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.39 m | |
| Chrysler Crossfire is 21 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Astra has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 225 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Opel Astra has
| |