Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 335 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 214 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 192 HP more power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 206 NM more than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler PT Cruiser) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.54 m | |
| Chrysler Crossfire is 23 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 1.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |