Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Audi A4 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Crossfire) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A4) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 335 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 172 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 51 cm shorter than the Audi A4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 246 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A4 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 141 litres less trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Audi A4 has
| |