Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 289 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 22 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Spider, but torque is 21 NM more than Alfa Romeo Spider. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 13.2 | |
|
The Chrysler Crossfire is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Crossfire consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means that by driving the Chrysler Crossfire over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Crossfire gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Spider) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 24 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 147 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 42 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Spider. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 1.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has
| |