Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 335 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 289 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 95 HP more power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 131 NM more than Alfa Romeo GTV. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 13.2 | |
|
The Chrysler Crossfire is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Crossfire consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that by driving the Chrysler Crossfire over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 24 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 155 litres | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Crossfire has 60 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV. The Alfa Romeo GTV may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 1.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
| |