Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Hyundai Coupe 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 75 HP more power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 124 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Coupe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Hyundai Coupe) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Crossfire engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Crossfire might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Crossfire engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Coupe 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Coupe 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.33 m | |
| Chrysler Crossfire is 34 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Hyundai Coupe has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 205 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.6 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |