Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Ford Mustang 2005

 
Chrysler Crossfire
2003 - 2008
Ford Mustang
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.2 Petrol4.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 218 HP212 HP
Torque: 310 NM325 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 seconds7 seconds
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 6 HP more power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 15 NM less than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.110.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km10.8 l/100km
By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chrysler Crossfire over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway720 km on highway
550 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.06 m4.77 m
Width: 1.77 m1.88 m
Height: 1.30 m1.39 m
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller.
Chrysler Crossfire is 71 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres350 litres
Ford Mustang has more luggage space.
Chrysler Crossfire has 135 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang.
Turning diameter: 10.3 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`665no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 600010 800
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Crossfire has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Ford Mustang has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv