Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 212 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 325 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 7 seconds | |
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 6 HP more power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 15 NM less than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chrysler Crossfire over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 71 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 350 litres | |
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 135 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |