Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Citroen C4 2004

 
Chrysler Crossfire
2003 - 2008
Citroen C4
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.2 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 218 HP110 HP
Torque: 310 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 seconds11.9 seconds
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 108 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 163 NM more than Citroen C4. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.17.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km7.8 l/100km
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 450 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway1050 km on highway
550 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C4) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 10 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes MLInstalled on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 might be a better choice in this respect.
Citroen C4 2004 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ...  More about Citroen C4 2004 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.06 m4.27 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.30 m1.46 m
Chrysler Crossfire is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres314 litres
Citroen C4 has more luggage space.
Chrysler Crossfire has 99 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6651`720
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 60001600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Crossfire has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Citroen C4 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv