Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Citroen C4 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 108 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 163 NM more than Citroen C4. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C4) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Citroen C4 2004 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen C4 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.46 m | |
Chrysler Crossfire is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 16 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 314 litres | |
Citroen C4 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 99 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |