Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs BMW 3 series 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 68 HP more power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 20 NM less than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 660 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Crossfire engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Crossfire might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
| Chrysler Crossfire is 43 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 410 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 195 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |