Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Audi TT 2006

 
Chrysler Crossfire
2003 - 2008
Audi TT
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 218 HP250 HP
Torque: 310 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 seconds5.7 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 32 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.19.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway820 km on highway
550 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.06 m4.18 m
Width: 1.77 m1.84 m
Height: 1.30 m1.35 m
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller.
Chrysler Crossfire is 12 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres290 litres
Audi TT has more luggage space.
Chrysler Crossfire has 75 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6651`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 60008200
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Crossfire has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv