Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Audi A5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Crossfire) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 28 HP more power than Audi A5, but torque is 90 NM less than Audi A5. Thanks to more power Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 510 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 56 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 240 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Audi A5 has
| |