Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Mazda RX-8 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 192 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 211 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 6.5 seconds | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 10.8 - 11.4 | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda RX-8. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 34 cm shorter than the Mazda RX-8, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
|
Mazda RX-8 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mazda RX-8. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda RX-8. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`779 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |