Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Audi TT 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Crossfire is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.2 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 160 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 250 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 6.5 seconds | 4.6 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 13 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 290 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 75 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`763 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Audi TT has
| |