Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Chrysler Crossfire is available only with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo Brera can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.2 (petrol) | 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 185 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 6.5 seconds | 6.8 - 8.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 6.8 - 12.2 | |
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo Brera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
Chrysler Crossfire is smaller. Chrysler Crossfire is 35 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Brera, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
Alfa Romeo Brera has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 85 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.4 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 2`006 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Alfa Romeo Brera has
| |