Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Jaguar XJ6 1994
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 219 HP | |
Torque: | 245 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Chrysler Concorde engine produces 56 HP less power than Jaguar XJ6, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Jaguar XJ6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 86 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ6) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.15 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.30 m | |
Chrysler Concorde is larger. Chrysler Concorde is 15 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ6, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 430 litres | |
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 43 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XJ6. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Jaguar XJ6 has
| |