Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Jaguar XJ6 1994

 
Chrysler Concorde
1993 - 1997
Jaguar XJ6
1994 - 1996
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.3 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP219 HP
Torque: 245 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.9 seconds
Chrysler Concorde engine produces 56 HP less power than Jaguar XJ6, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Jaguar XJ6.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.3no data
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres86 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ6) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 5.15 m5.00 m
Width: 1.89 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.30 m
Chrysler Concorde is larger.
Chrysler Concorde is 15 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ6, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 473 litres430 litres
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity.
Chrysler Concorde has 43 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XJ6.
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data2`220
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data3000
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Concorde has
  • roomier boot
Jaguar XJ6 has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv