Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler Concorde engine produces 56 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jaguar XJ. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.2 | |
|
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger. Chrysler Concorde is 13 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |