Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Hyundai Equus 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Concorde engine produces 43 HP more power than Hyundai Equus, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Hyundai Equus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 12.5 | |
|
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Equus, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Equus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but lower. Chrysler Concorde is 25 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 25 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Hyundai Equus has
| |