Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 237 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 44 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Concorde gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger. Chrysler Concorde is 62 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
| |