Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 88 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 46 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |