Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Volvo S80 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 9 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.6 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 46 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |