Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs SAAB 9-5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 22 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 49 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.8 | |
| Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but lower. Chrysler Concorde is 45 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |