Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs SAAB 9-5 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 2 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 49 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.5 | |
|
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 48 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`800 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |