Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 84 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.6 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 38 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Opel Omega has
| |