Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Audi A6 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 228 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 301 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 48 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 69 NM less than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 8.1 | |
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.28 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 48 cm longer than the Audi A6, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 551 litres | |
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Concorde has 21 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Chrysler Concorde uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`145 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Audi A6 has
| |