Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Peugeot 607 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 92 HP more power than Peugeot 607, but torque is 16 NM less than Peugeot 607. Thanks to more power Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 607, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 41 cm longer than the Peugeot 607, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 481 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 49 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 607. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Peugeot 607 has
| |