Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 58 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Thanks to more power Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger. Chrysler Concorde is 46 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |