Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Hyundai Equus 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 228 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 301 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler Concorde engine produces 18 HP more power than Hyundai Equus, but torque is 13 NM less than Hyundai Equus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 12.5 | |
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Equus, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.28 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but lower. Chrysler Concorde is 21 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 505 litres | |
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 25 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`265 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
| |