Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Chrysler LHS 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Concorde engine produces 10 HP more power than Chrysler LHS, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Chrysler LHS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler LHS, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Concorde and Chrysler LHS are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Chrysler LHS has
| |