Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Opel Omega 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Concorde is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Opel Omega has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Concorde is available with front wheel drive, while Opel Omega can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.3 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Opel Omega is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 218 HP | 116 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 300 NM | 175 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.3 | 7.4 - 9.7 | |
|
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Concorde is 36 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Concorde has 57 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. This could mean that the Chrysler Concorde uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`101 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Opel Omega has
| |