Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Volvo 940 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Concorde is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo 940 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Concorde is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo 940 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.3 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 218 HP | 82 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 300 NM | 145 - 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.3 | 7.5 - 10.3 | |
|
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo 940. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger. Chrysler Concorde is 28 cm longer than the Volvo 940, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 471 litres | |
| Chrysler Concorde has 2 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`878 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |