Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Concorde is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jaguar XJ has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Concorde is available with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XJ can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.3 - 3.5 | 3.2 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 218 HP | 219 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 300 NM | 315 - 512 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.3 | 10.6 - 12.0 | |
|
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger. Chrysler Concorde is 13 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |