Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Hyundai Equus 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 3.5 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 253 HP | 210 - 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 339 NM | 314 - 381 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 10.8 | 12.5 - 13.5 | |
|
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Equus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.29 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is larger, but lower. Chrysler Concorde is 22 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 25 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
| |