Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 253 HP | 163 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 339 NM | 245 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 10.8 | 9.1 - 10.6 | |
|
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Intrepid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.29 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler Concorde is 13 cm longer than the Dodge Intrepid, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler Concorde has 10 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |