Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 114 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler 300M consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 645 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300M consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 1250 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 300M is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | 1106 litres | |
| Chrysler 300M has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 576 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chrysler 300M can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.6/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |